Anthony is a litigator with a variety of experience handling employment and labor law, breaches of non-compete agreements and shareholder disputes. In addition, he has representative experience with civil rights matters and violations of the Child Victims Act. Anthony counsels and represents clients in New Jersey and Pennsylvania state and federal courts.
Prior to joining Litchfield Cavo LLP, Anthony was an attorney in the Office of the Solicitor for the United States Department of Labor where he tried several cases involving violations of workplace health and safety regulations.
While a student at Rutgers Law School, Anthony was a legal intern for the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, United States Attorney’s Office and New Jersey Chief Justice Stuart Rabner.
Practices
Education
- Rutgers Law School, JD, 2010
- Rutgers University–Camden, MA, English, 2005
- Rowan University, BA, Psychology, 2001
Admissions
- Pennsylvania
- New Jersey
- United States District Court: District of New Jersey
- United States Court of Appeals: Third Circuit
Languages
- English
Presentations/Publications
- Co-Author, “From ‘Reefer Madness’ to the War on Drugs to Legal Recreational Marijuana“, New Jersey Lawyer (October 2022)
- Co-Author, “The Houston Astros Stole Bases and Signs – But Did They Also Steal Trade Secrets?,” IPWatchdog (August 2021)
- Author, “Third Circuit Grants Rule 38 Motion Against Attorney Who Copy-and-Pasted Appellate Brief,” On Appeal, Bar Association for the Third Federal Circuit (August 2021)
- Co-Author, “Instead of Clarifying Trademark Law, Brunetti Provides the Roadmap for Future Uncertainty,” New Jersey Lawyer (October 2020)
- Co-Author, “‘What You Don’t Know, [Can] Hurt You’ — ERISA’s Statute Of Limitations Conundrum,” Bloomberg Tax (November 2019)
- Co-Author, “Lawyers, Data Privacy, Cybersecurity and the Ethics Rules,” The Barrister (May 2019)
- Co-Author, “The Potential Pitfalls to Hiring Candidates with Noncompete Agreements,” Human Resource Executive (May 2019)
- Author, “Third Circuit Explains What Constitutes a “Final Decision” and Reverses an Order to Compel Arbitration; Cup v. Ampco Pittsburgh Corporation, 903 F.3d 58 (3d Cir. 2018),” On Appeal, Volume XII, Number 3, Bar Association for the Third Federal Circuit (December 2018)
- Author, “The Rashoman Effect, Jury Instructions, and Peremptory Challenges: Rethinking Hernandez v. New York,” 40 Rutgers L.J. 783 (2010)
- Author, “Salinger’s a Perfect Day for Bananafish,” 66 Explicator 149 (2008)
- Author, “The Power of Ahab’s Speech,” 1 Milton & Melville Rev. 13 (2007)
- Author, “The Viewing,” Writer’s Post J., Sept. 2007, at 58